?

Log in

Jan. 26th, 2017

tapir

Three new ideas from Louisiana

I'm just back from twelve days in New Orleans and the Inst-Int interactive and media arts convention, and I came home with three significant new project ideas. I'd love your input: https://www.patreon.com/posts/7891908

Dec. 28th, 2016

lando

Some thoughts on Rogue One

Haven't been posting much here, but I have been over on Patreon, where there have been a bunch of new photos in the last month or so as I'm doing my annual trip through the older archive, pulling out photos that I couldn't finish, or just didn't publish, in the years they were taken. There's some really nice stuff there, and worth taking a gander at.

I also wrote up some thoughts about Rogue One and deep characterization today: https://www.patreon.com/posts/7604068

Dec. 9th, 2016

synthcalc

Statistical analysis of my MRAC grants panel

So today I was on my first regional arts grant panel, for the Community Arts grant of the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council. Seven panelists reviewed 26 grant applications, each scoring then on a scale of 1-6 after panel discussion. Applications were from five suburban Twin Cities Counties: Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott, and Washington. I gave 103 total points for an average score of 3.96. Other panelists gave total points of 95, 96, 102, 103, 104, and 107, so we were all quite close. One panelist gave no ones, one panelist gave no sixes, and one panelist gave neither ones nor sixes. One panelist, somewhat strangely, gave no twos. My score distribution:

1: 2
2: 2
3: 7
4. 4
5: 6
6: 5

My scoring was extremely congruent with the group's scoring; the order of my scores and the order of the average scores differed by only one grant I gave a five which moved over two sixes. Every other panelist had more variation.

I gave the singularly lowest score three times and the singularly highest score twice. This seems reasonable. However only nine grants recieved a singularly high score, and nine a singularly low score, as there was much agreement among the panelists. (One grant received both. I was low on that one.)

One grant received a maximum score based on the panelist proclivities described above. No grants received a minimum score.

Going into the panel process I had ranked grants on a scale including half-points in order to give me room to move scores based on panel discussion. Of ten grants I gave half-point scores to, I moved down half a point based on panelist input eight times and up twice. I also moved grants with whole-number preliminary scores down a full point three times based on panelist input.

Washington County - and particularly the St. Croix Valley - got an exceptional number of high scores both from me and from the panelists at large. Of five grants which recieved a 5-point average or higher, three were in the St. Croix Valley, and another was tied for sixth.

I'm reasonably content with the way the panel went.

Nov. 26th, 2016

Forward Momentum

Holiday sale

Haven't posted here in a while, but I keep reading. News of the moment is that I'm at home without a huge project in hand for the holiday season for the first time in several years, so I've decided to so something of a blowout photography sale. Parts 1 and 2 are up now - sales on small prints, the hardcover of The Reader: War for the Oaks, and 2017 calendars. There's Part 3 and Part 4 at least still to come.

As part of this I've also done a complete update of photos on the website, so those of you who aren't following along on Patreon should have a bunch of new things to look at.

Oct. 17th, 2016

existential

Not exactly an existential crisis.

If you are someone who finds meaning in my photography, I would like to hear from you about how.